Just my opinion but I'm sure there are a lot of people who think similarly. I used to be very acquainted with the equations but I now want to concentrate on design and not equations and then design. If you want to use generic physics models and minimize the time from of a product I suggest ANSYS and if you want more best access to the physics regardless of.
Comsol vs ansys software#
If you are a programming / Matlab type then by all means is Comsol a potentially good tool - however, for companies, Comsol would actually be the expensive option since you need skilled people to use it - most RF and MW engineers don't want to be thinking about the equations being used but the actual design of the device - if the software has been validated and is widely used, then software such as CST's is very attractive.
Comsol vs ansys full#
Their EMS solver can do this - perhaps not full multi-physics stuff but you can do a thermal solution using MWS losses - pretty convenient.Ĭomsol is conceptually pretty powerful but you really need to know what you are doing and also know whether the results make sense - the number of factors that can affect the results is higher - same for Ansys - most people cannot say, without some sort of measurement, whether the results can be trutsed or not - the mesh is for example different for an electromagnetic field than for a thermal mesh.Ĭomsol really cannot compete with MWS / EMS when it comes to user friendliness, CAD import and post-processing etc. Now I must subcontract someone to make these model, on top of mine, this is the cost to pay.You seem to be pretty quick to assume what CST can't do. On the other hand we wold like to know, what are the fields where COMSOL is better than ANSYS or vice versa. Primary we would use COMSOL for students if the learning effort is lower as for Ansys. Fluid-structure interactions, where a two-way coupling is required (COMSOL 3.4 versus ANSYS CFX 11.0) 2). Our hope with COMSOL, is to get a more user friendly package for lower price as for Ansys. I have institutional clients that requests models delivered in Ansys, respectively Nastran. The performances of COMSOL to reach the same accuracy in solving four benchmark cases were compared with other commercial packages: 1). But these clients are not requesting "multi-physics" for those two tools, so globally I'm still a winner ) Now I must subcontract someone to make these model, on top of mine, this is the cost to pay. Watch this video to get an introduction to the new version, including core functionality u. I have institutional clients that requests models delivered in Ansys, respectively Nastran. We released COMSOL Multiphysics® version 5.6 on November 11, 2020. was an easy way to plot the maximal absolute principal stress on ANSYS Workbench. The main difference between all ANSYS flavors and COMSOL Multiphysics in general is that in COMSOL you can actually type in the PDEs you want to solve in the explicit mathematical symbols way and it automatically creates the weak form and discretizes the problem. You can solve a 3D model with more than a. On the basis of the department of biotechnics and engineering of NTU KPI scientific school. When a Max/Min Volume, Max/Min Surface, or Max/Min Line plot is used. Post by Yousef Sharifi I am using both, Comsol is easier to learn/use and its cheap. Issues I have with COMSOL, not the tool, but it's renommé: Modeling in ANSYS and Comsol multiphysics. I cannot give you relative ratios, as my knowledge of "modern Ansys" is not there any longer, that is >10 years old )īut I can give you the + why I have chosen COMSOL and dropped Ansys and Nastran.ġ) real multi-physics in a common environment, with a new, modern and excellent methodological approachģ) strong academic background (sometimes I'm missing more engineering oriented efficiency approaches in COMSOL, but its coming steadily )Ĥ) the price is interesting (I do not know about academic prices )ĥ) Issue from a (still) "small" and private company, with high skilled, accessible personnel (and they are not yet? overrun by managers and lawyers)